(Excerpt from the Behave! book)
Working with the motivational factor of Identity led us to one of the most
important insights into why existing employee engagement strategies get such
mediocre results.
We form our Identities in various social contexts:
at work; in the community; at our place of worship; in our extended families;
in our immediate family; and with our college buddies with whom we occasionally
go out to have a beer. When we form these Identities we use three different
structures. Most Identities are
created in adult-to-adult relationships.
In our immediate families, part of the Identity is Parent-to-Child when we play the parent role to our
children and their friends. When we go
out with our college buddies, it’s a Child-to-Child relationship; we’re just
having some fun.
However, at no point
do we seek out an Identity where we
play the Child role and some other adult plays the Parent role. This relationship makes us uncomfortable and
we don’t like it. When it is imposed
upon us, we like it even less. The look
on the little girl’s face in the photo is exactly how we all feel about being
in that position. We seek to avoid it.
Unfortunately, the way hierarchical companies structure
the manager-to-subordinate relationship, it devolves into a Parent-to-Child
relationship far too often. Because the
person in the superior position can get some valuable Identity for themselves by playing the power card, the lure of the
Parent role can be very strong. And even
for a good manager, no matter how hard he or she tries to keep the relationship
on an Adult-to-Adult level, the subtext for the subordinate is always that this
is just a misstep away from going to Parent-to-Child. It is an uncomfortable relationship. Bad managers have taught us this, and we’ve
all met these managers.
No comments:
Post a Comment